BRADFORD CROWN COURT TRIAL FIXING 100% PROOF 100% FACT!
CAMERA'S IN COURT
DPP'S HEAD (DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS) KEIR STARMER QC AND JOHN RYLEY, THE HEAD AND CHIEF EDITOR OF SKY NEWS BOTH AGREE TO CAMERA'S IN COURT FOR CLARITY AND ACCOUNTIBILITY MAKING SURE THE PUBLIC ACTUALLY SEE JUSTICE!
* THIS WHOLE CASE REVOLVES AROUND THE TAPE / TRANSCRIPT BETWEEN THE PROSECUTION BARRISTER AND DR LOWE. THEY HAVE BEEN MICROSCOPICALLY CHECKED AND DISSECTED WORD BY WORD, SECOND BY SECOND.
THIS IS THE FIRST TIME EVER THERE HAS BEEN UNDENIABLE EVIDENCE OF CORRUPTION WITHIN THE BRITISH JUDICIARY WHICH IS BY FAR THE OLDEST IN THE WORLD AND 'SUPPOSEDLY' THE FAIREST!
DR JAN LOWE HIMSELF ADMITS HIS FORENSIC EVIDENCE HAS BEEN CHANGED AFTER THE FACT. TEL 01642 624447 OR 07973 116796.
THE FACT IS 75.5% (OVER THREE QUARTERS) OF THIS CROSS EXAMINATION IS MISSING AND WHAT WAS IN REALITY PROVEN AT COURT NOT POSSIBLE, SUDDENLY IN THE DOCTORED REMAINING 24.5% (UNDER A QUARTER) OF THE TAPE / TRANSCRIPT IT FALSLEY STATES THE CRIME POSSIBLE! THIS IS ABSOLUTE LIES!! * IT HAS BEEN DOCTORED THAT MUCH IT DOESN'T EVEN HAVE THE ACTUAL PROSECUTION CASE IN IT!!
FORENSIC ANIMATION SHOWS HOW BLATANT DR JAN LOWES EVIDENCE AT COURT HAS BEEN CHANGED AFTER THE FACT. ANDREW VANZIE OF BAXENDALE AND VANZIE SOLICITORS IN HALIFAX IS MY LEGAL WITNESS PRESENT AT THE TRIAL.
CONTACT HIM ON 01422 380 200, ASK HIM TO EXPLAIN CRIME NOT POSSIBLE. ALSO ASK HIM WHY HE INITIALLY AGREED TO MEET MY EX PARTNER AND I FOR AN APPOINTMENT WHEN WE WENT TO HIS HOUSE WITH PROOF OF MY FACTUAL INNOCENCE, THEN HE CANCELLED IT AT THE ELEVENTH HOUR WHEN HE FOUND OUT THE MEDIA WOULD BE PRESENT, THEN 3 YEARS LATER FOR HIM TO LIE TO POLICE IN A STATEMENT, THAT I HAD CANCELLED THAT APPOINTMENT.
Q/ WHY WOULD I CANCEL AN APPOINTMENT AFTER FIGHTING FOR 16 YEARS WHICH WOULD HAVE UNCOVERED MY DELIBERATE RIGGED FALSE IMPRISONMENT. I ALSO PROVED TO HIM WITH HIS OWN DOCUMENT, WHICH HE SIGNED, THAT HE HAD MISINTERPRETED DR LOWES REPORT EVEN BEFORE IT WENT TO CROWN COURT, WHICH PROVED THEN THAT THE PROSECUTION CASE WAS NEVER POSSIBLE!
* ALSO, DIAMOND CUT LIVE (FORENSICS), 7.5 LATER EDITIONS - EDI-TRACKER, OR SIMPLY DESCRIBED IN LAYMENS TERMS, AS AN EDIT FINDER WHICH IS THE LATEST TECHNOLOGY FROM AMERICA TO PROVE UNDENIABLE BRITISH JUDICIAL CORRUPTION IN DOCTORED COURT TAPES*
THE DEFENCE CASE (WE HAD TWO MEDICAL EXPERTS)
The complainant threw punches towards me, (the defendant Charlton Harris), I attempted to block them by protecting my face, he then kicked me with a sweeping kick to my lower left leg which resulted in a large bruise. We both lost balance, so in self defence I pushed him away because people were behind me. We both fell BACKWARDS in the direction from where the complainant had come from and struggled on the floor FOR A MINUTE OR SO where there was broken glass. THIS WAS BACKED UP 100% BY DR JAN LOWE IN REALITY AT COURT.
THE DEFENCE HAD TWO MEDICAL EXPERTS
1st AN INDEPENDENT PATHOLOGIST (Dr JAN LOWE,who's evidence was changed after the fact. WE HAVE 100% PROOF OF THIS!)
2nd THE POLICE SURGEON (DR LESLEY LORD,) WHO NEVER TURNED UP!
For ONE YEAR TWO AND A HALF MONTHS, I Instructed my "Defence Barrister" Mr Bassra to subpoena her to court, he lied to me because 5 minutes before the trial started he then told me she is not coming. My reply was 'Well I am going home then because I am not being railroaded because the sheer existence and causation of her medical findings are VITAL' because they back up the defence case 100% and prove that their one witness must have lied because he said there was NO STRUGGLE!! His reply to that was " If you go home now it will alienate you with the trial Judge but don,t worry , you still have one medical expert here"!! That was Dr Jan Lowe who's EVIDENCE THEY CHANGED AFTER THE FACT!
1st Defence Expert
Dr JAN LOWE'S REPORT MATCH THE DEFENCE CASE 100%
DEFENCE PICTURES BELOW
AREA OF INJURIES TO BOTH PARTIES MARKED IN PURPLE
The Defendant The Complainant
DR LOWE'S PURPOSE OF REPORT ''
I note that you wish me to address whether the injuries sustained by the complainant are more in keeping with having been struck by a bottle in the face or with him being involved in a struggle on the floor where there was broken glass.
DR LOWE'S CONCLUSIONS
1st THE DEFENDANT The injuries to both shoulders, the right collarbone and both forearms sustained by your client, Mr Harris, are entirely in keeping with him having been involved in a struggle and having been kicked on the outer side of his left leg. The 3 separate incised wounds on the hand points to him falling on his outstretched hand onto glass AND NOT CONSISTANT WITH SOMEBODY WHO WAS HOLDING A BROKEN GLASS IN AN ATTACK!
2nd THE COMPLAINANT The chipped tooth suggests a knock of mild force from under the chin with the transmission of force through contact of the teeth on the lower jaw to the teeth on the upper jaw.
###THE MAIN , deep incised wound to the complainants nose, ###
(Y) MAY have been caused by either broken glass eg. a bottle thrust into his face which is the prosecution case (50%) OR BY
(Z) The defence case (50%) of struggling and falling face down on broken glass on the floor.
HOWEVER the 3 superficial incised wounds to the left cheek and the POSITION of the incised wound on the BACK of the ear were DEFINITELY caused by struggling and falling face down on glass on th floor.
FIRSTLY Most importantly the SHEER EXISTENCE of these injuries and their ABSOLUTE ASSOCIATION to (Z) above points to the defence case 100%
SECONDLY THERE SIMPLE PRESENCE as well as ALL the other injuries to both parties rules out (Y) above prosecution case with absolutely NO CHANCE OF POSSIBILITY(0%).
2nd Defence Expert
DR LESLEY LORD'S MEDICAL EXAMINATION OF JUST THE DEFENDANT MR HARRIS
SHORT DESCRIPTION OF INCIDENT
Mr Harris told me that he had been in a scuffle and that someone had kicked him on the left leg. In self defence he had pushed the other person away and they both fell to the floor onto several bottles and glasses.
DR LORD'S CONCLUSIONS
1/ The injury to the outer side of the lower left leg was consistant with a kick to that area.
2/ The cuts and scratches on both forearms and the right hand were not what I would have expected in someone who had been holding broken glass but are MUCH MORE CONSISTANT WITH HIS ACCOUNT OF HAVING FALLEN ONTO BROKEN GLASS IN A STUGGLE.
3/ The grazes to both shoulders and the right collarbone were consistant with a general struggle.
FIRSTLY BOTH THE MEDICAL EXPERTS CONCLUDED THE SHEER EXISTENCE OF ALL THE INJURIES TO BOTH PARTIES PROVES 100% THE ONE AND ONLY PROSECUTION WITNESS BELOW MUST HAVE LIED!!
SECONDLY BOTH THE MEDICAL EXPERTS CONCLUDED THAT ALL THE INJURIES TO BOTH PARTIES WERE ASSOCIATED!!
THE PROSECUTION CASE (THEY HAD NO MEDICAL EXPERTS)
Their ONE and ONLY prosecution witness said I twice hit a bottle on the edge of the table before it broke, then ran at the Complainant from 5 feet, hitting him with a single blow in his chest/face with him FALLING BACKWARDS ALONE. See Crime Not Possible. Then for an unknown man to hold him up immediately after he'd gone down. Supposedly the whole incident lasting between 3-5 SECONDS according to this solitary witness who is a self confessed perjurer. We have 100% PROOF OF THIS IN THE CROWN COURT TAPED AND TRANSCRIPT EVIDENCE!
THE ABSOLUTE MOST IMPORTANT THING THIS PERJURER HAS MISSED OUT IN THIS COMPENSATION SCAM IS THERE IS NO MENTION OF ANY STRUGGLE BETWEEN US BOTH WHICH IS THE EXACT OPPOSITE TO BOTH THE MEDICAL EXPERTS FACTS BECAUSE THE STRUGGLE INJURIES SIMPLY EXIST. YOU JUST CANT PRETEND THAT THEY ARE NOT THERE!!
THE PROSECUTION PICTURES BELOW
The only admission in Dr Lowe's report which MAY fit with the prosecution case is the one and only main injury to the complainants nose ( marked in green ).But the sheer existence of all associated injuries to both parties, gives the prosecution case no chance of possibility (0%).
The Defendant The Complainant
THE PROSECUTION CASE WAS PROVEN NOT POSSIBLE 0% BY DR JAN LOWE IN REALITY AT COURT.
********************THIS IS CRITICAL PHASE 1 ***********************
VIDEO RECONSTRUCTIONS OF THE ACTUAL CROSS EXAMINATION OF Dr LOWE BY THE PROSECUTION BARRISTER (Mr HARING) FOR ABSOLUTE CLARITY!!
THIS WHOLE CASE REVOLVES AROUND THIS CROSS-EXAMINATION which in reality the argument lasted 30 minutes at court AND PROVED THE PROSECUTION CASE NOT POSSIBLE!! We have The Official Bradford Crown Courts own timed records to prove this !....
IMPORTANT REMINDER The prosecution case was that there was NEVER ANY GLASS ON THE FLOOR and there was NO STRUGGLE and EVERYBODY AGREED, (ALL THE MEDICAL EXPERTS, THE DEFENCE AND THE PROSECUTION) EITHER THE COMPLAINANT/COMPLAINANT AND THE DEFENDANT FELL BACKWARDS !!
VIDEO 1 SETTING THE SCENE OF THE INCIDENT.
VIDEO 2 THE ACTUAL PROSECUTION CASE, A single bottle blow to the complainants face/chest to cause the nose, cheek and ear injuries WITH HIM FALLING BACKWARDS ALONE which was PROVEN NOT POSSIBLE AT COURT. This bombshell dropped because Dr Lowe made Mr Haring accept the complainants 3 separate injuries to his left cheek and the injury to the back of his left ear MUST HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY STRUGGLING IN GLASS ON THE FLOOR 100%...ALSO his nose, cheek and ear injuries were ALL ASSOCIATED AND HAPPENED AT THE SAME TIME!!
VIDEO 3 Mr HARING'S IMPROVISED NEW VERSION TO FIT THESE MEDICALLY PROVEN FACTS.....said, physically tongue in cheek, bearing in mind EVERYBODY EVEN THE COMPLAINANT HIMSELF SAID HE FELL BACKWARDS,1st "What if Harris hits the complainant in the nose with the BOTTLE for his main injury,2nd then the complainant falling 5 FEET FORWARDS with his hands by his side to fall on the GLASS which had come off the SAME BOTTLE moments earlier, to cause his cheek and ear injuries struggling in that SAME GLASS on the floor ON HIS OWN!!Dr Lowe said NO WAY, they were ALL ASSOCIATED and happened AT THE SAME TIME AND DEFINITELY NOT TWO SEPARATE INCIDENTS!! OBVIOUSLY Dr LOWE NEVER ACCEPTED THIS GARBAGE!! THIS NEW MADE UP SCENARIO HAD JUDGE JAMES GOSS BURST OUT INTO LAUGHTER AS WELL AS THE PUBLIC GALLERY.................. WELL NOT UNTIL PHASE 2 BELOW.
*******************THIS IS CRITICAL PHASE 2 **********************
VIDEO RECONSTRUCTIONS OF THE FALSIFIED TRANSCRIPT/WRITTEN DOCUMENT OF THE CROSS EXAMINATION OF Dr LOWE BY THE PROSECUTION BARRISTER (Mr HARING) FOR ABSOLUTE CLARITY!!
JUDGE JAMES GOSS FALSIFYING THE TRANSCRIPT/WRITTEN DOCUMENT OF Dr LOWES CROSS-EXAMINATION BY THE PROSECUTION BARRISTER Mr HARING TO COVER UP HIS LIES TO THE JURY IN HIS SUMMING UP.
From 30 minutes long in reality ARGUING and proving the prosecution case not possible, its gone to 11minutes long (2/3rds missing) AND AGREEING in this written transcript/document to state the prosecution version WAS POSSIBLE 4 TIMES! It has changed that much IT DOESN'T EVEN HAVE THE ACTUAL PROSECUTION CASE IN IT!!
CLEAR VIDEO RECONSTRUCTIONS TO HIGHLIGHT JUDGE JAMES GOSS'S CORRUPTION AFTER THE FACT.....
VIDEO 4 AMAZINGLY It starts off straight away BY STEALING the defence cases causation of the complainants cheek and ear injuries of been caused by glass on the floor.(Page 5 row E) but fails to mention he would have to have FALLEN 5 FEET FORWARDS to do this!! It doesn,t even have the real prosecution case in this doctored written transcript. This is because it was proven impossible at court.
THIS IS THE EXACT SAME SCENARIO AS Mr HARINGS NEW IMPROVISED VERSION AS ABOVE IN REALITY AT COURT (video 3) BUT IN THIS DOCTORED WRITTEN TRANSCRIPT, Dr LOWE "SUPPOSEDLY ACCEPTS THIS FORCED NEW VERSION..UTTER GARBAGE!! This was done to cover for bent judge James Goss's lies in his summing up to the jury.
Another idiotic false version below
VIDEO 5 Yet another conjured up scenario which in reality never happened at court........I smash a BOTTLE twice on the edge of the table before it breaks, then run at the complainant from 5 feet, I then hit the complainant in the nose for the main injury, the force of this makes us both fall 5 forward back to where I allegedly broke the SAME BOTTLE earlier to fall on that SAME GLASS to cause the complainants cheek, ear and tooth injuries, PLUS my injuries to my hand while we both struggle on the floor...Yeah Right!!
JUDGE JAMES GOSS'S CORRUPTION IN A NUTSHELL
1. IN REALITY AT COURT THE DEFENCE MEDICAL EXPERT DR LOWE TOLD JURY PROSECUTION CASE IS NOT POSSIBLE.
2. THE DAY AFTER, JUDGE JAMES GOSS LIED IN HIS SUMMING UP and told the jury Dr Lowe had said under cross examination it was possible,(that garbage FALLING 5 FEET FORWARDS scenario in video 3 at the end of phase 1.) Which clearly IN REALITY AT COURT was proven not possible.
3. I GO TO JAIL FOR FIVE YEARS but then I set a UK precedent because I tell the parole board "I'm not admitting to a crime which was proven in reality in court impossible"........ i get parole, It's never happened before and It's never happened since!!
4. I TRY TO GET THE TRIAL WRITTEN TRANSCRIPTS/DOCUMENTS AND THEN THE CROWN COURT TAPES TO PROVE GOSS'S LIES IN HIS SUMMING UP.
5. JUDGE JAMES GOSS FINDS OUT OFF MR BASSRA AND ROBIN FRIEZE and changes the written transcripts/documents and tapes to match his lies in his summing up so the prosecution case appears possible for anyone who reads the written transcript at a later date who is trying to get an appeal. (see the video reconstructions of this tampered written transcript above in video 4 and 5 and have a good laugh at the FICTICIOUS FALLING 5 FEET FORWARDS GARBAGE!!)
6. THE OFFICIAL BRADFORD CROWN COURTS OWN TIMED RECORDS PROVES UNDENIABLY DEFENCE MEDICAL EXPERT DR LOWE'S EVIDENCE HAS BEEN CHANGED AFTER THE FACT.(**see official document below**)
7. THIS MEANS JUDGE JAMES GOSS IS GUILTY OF PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE.
SMOKING GUN EVIDENCE OF CORRUPTION BELOW (OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS)
FOR THE OFFICIAL BRADFORD CROWN COURT OWN TIMINGS OF DR LOWES PRESENCE IN THE WITNESS BOX IN REALITY AT COURT
PLEASE CLICK ON DR LOWES TIMING WHICH IS 1 PAGE... ACTUAL TIME IS 63 MINUTES LONG. THIS IS FACT!!
A (ABOVE 63 MINUTES) THEN TAKE AWAY (B BELOW 33 MINUTES)
HARPHAMS OWN TIMING OF A TRANSCRIPT 3,989 WORDS LONG. ACTUAL TIME LASTING 33 MINUTES LONG. THIS IS FACT!!
30 MINUTES MISSING VERBATIM (WORD FOR WORD) THIS IS FACT!!
FOR THEE FAKE 'OFFICIAL' WRITTEN TRANSCRIPT /DOCUMENT OF DR LOWES EVIDENCE.
PLEASE CLICK ON FAKED TRANSCRIPT WHICH IS 13 PAGES... EDITED TO 33 MINUTES LONG.
VITAL SHAM ON PAGE 3 ROW B IN THIS DODGY TRANSCRIPT OF THE DEFENCE BARRISTER V DR LOWE CROSS EXAMINATION IS THE ONLY SOLITARY PART WHICH ACTUALLY STATES WHICH DIRECTION THE DEFENDANT OR THE COMPLAINANT FALLS.
IT STATES "THE DEFENDANT SAYS THAT HE, IN FACT, DURING THE INCIDENT, FELL FACE FORWARDS ON THE FLOOR."
Q/ "WOULD YOU SAY THAT THOSE FINDINGS OF DR LORDS EITHER SUPPORTED OR NEGATED THAT?"
A/ "IN MY OPINION THEY SUPPORT THAT SUGGESTION, YES."
VITAL - "SO DR LORD, DR LOWE AGREE'S WITH THE DEFENDANT (ME) THAT THE DEFENDANT FELL FACE FORWARDS FOR A FACT!"
THIS CLEARLY SHOWS THE PROSCUTION BARRISTERS CROSS EXAMINATION OF DR LOWE IS A COMPLETE SHAM BECAUSE IN THE TRANSCRIPT EVERY ONE OF THEIR BIZARRE SCENARIO'S HAS US BOTH FALLING IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION AND WRONGLY STATING DR LOWE ACCEPTED THEM. THIS IS A COMPLETE LIE!!
THE ACTUAL PROSECUTION CASE PROVEN 100% NOT POSSIBLE!!
CRIME NOT POSSIBLE (TOP OF PAGE 4) THE UNDENIABLE TRUTH IN THE CROSS EXAMINATION BY THE DEFENCE BARRISTER Mr BASSRA OF Dr LOWE
Q/. WHY DID I SERVE FIVE YEARS FOR AN IMPOSSIBILITY??
Contact Charles on - 07561 193606 or 07554916591
BOTH BENT JUDGE JAMES GOSS AND TRAITOR SUKHBIR BASSRA SIMPLY REFUSE TO TAKE A POLYGRAPH TEST BECAUSE THEY KNOW THEIR CORRUPTION IS UNDENIABLE. IF I WAS THEIR FRIENDS OR FAMILY OR JUST WORKED NEAR THE SQUARE, I WOULD WANT TO KNOW WHY THEY REFUSE THESE TESTS. BASICALLY RECORDER JAMES GOSS QC CHANGED THE RECORDS. IT IS TIME TO NAME AND SHAME!!
Bent "Judge" James Goss who is the Head of Chambers at www.no6.co.uk (Leeds) 01132 459763. We hope he is not a crooked role model for his underlings at his chambers!! Judging by Bassra below, we are already too late because even before you go into the details of the case there is a BLATANT PROFESSIONAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST BECAUSE THEY BOTH BELONG IN THE SAME CHAMBERS!! THIS IS ILLEGAL!!
Bent "Defence Barrister" Sukhbir Bassra www.no6.co.uk (Leeds) 01132 459763. Surprise surprise they both work at the same chambers!!
A) IT IS BECAUSE THEY BOTH KNOW DAMN WELL I WRITE THE TRUTH!! Between them both, they have brought action against professional bodies such as the Police Force, GPs, Priests and members of Her Majesty's Prison Service for their wrongdoings!! So WHY can't these two criminals be prosecuted for their crimes??..... Are they above the law??
THE D.C.A. (DEPARTMENT FOR CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS) COULD BE FORCING THROUGH A NEW RULING. THEY WANT TO ALLOW CAMERAS INTO CROWN COURTS TO RECORD THE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE FIRST TIME IN LEGAL HISTORY. THE REASON FOR THIS IS TO ERADICATE JUDICIAL CORRUPTION.
THIS HAS BEEN BROUGHT ABOUT AS A DIRECT RESULT OF THIS CASE HERE,(www.bentjudgejamesgoss.co.uk), DUE TO THE UNDENIABLE TIMED DISCREPANCIES AND CHANGED MEDICAL EXPERTS FORENSIC EVIDENCE AFTER THE FACT.
They conspired and worked together and as a consequence I received FIVE YEARS in jail for an IMPOSSIBLE crime.
THE TWO IMPOSSIBILITIES
NUMBER 1 The prosecution version was proven a physical and forensic impossibility in reality at court by expert witnesses.
NUMBER 2 The impossibility of BENDING TIME.The judge lied to the jury in his summing up saying the crime was possible. TO COVER THIS UP, the crown court tapes are doctored so the crime appears possible. The problem is the Crown Courts own timed records prove UNDENIABLY the Crown Court tapes are missing 2/3rds of the content. THEY BOTH ADMIT THEY CAN NOT EXPLAIN THIS "LOST TIME."
On Friday the 14th September 2001 we went to Bradford Crown Court logger’s room to time the SUSPECT CROWN COURT TRIAL AUDIO TAPED RECORDINGS. The conclusion was, it backed up THEIR OWN crown court TIMED RECORDS that these CROWN COURT TRIAL AUDIO TAPED RECORDINGS MUST BE FAKE, with 2/3rds missing verbatim (word for word). The quality of the spliced editing was blatantly obvious with the background noises not consistent or matching the foreground of the doctored cross examinations. The three of us (including the court logger) burst out laughing at the obvious fraudulent recordings! If one word is missing from the CROWN COURT TRIAL AUDIO TAPED RECORDINGS, they have been corrupted but 2/3rds of TWO DEFENCE MEDICAL EXPERTS evidence missing is just BLATANT AND OBVIOUS CORRUPTION!! (Documentary Proof.)
EVERYBODY can interpret the SAME event differently
NOBODY can misinterpret TIME itself
you cannot bend TIME itself
IT IS AN IMPOSSIBILITY !!
PROFESSOR ROBERT DAMPER DENIED OFFICIAL TAPES. Tel 02380 263420. www.the-expert-witness.co.uk/robertdamper
THE U.K.'s TOP AUDIO TAPE RECORDING AUTHENTICITY EXPERT ROBERT DAMPER BSc MSc PhD DIC CEng FIEE CPhys FInstP SenMIEEE FIOA OF THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON WAS POINT BLANK REFUSED ACCESS TO SEVERAL CONTESTED CROWN COURT TRIAL AUDIO TAPED RECORDINGS OFF BENT TRIAL JUDGE JAMES GOSS BECAUSE BENT JUDGE JAMES GOSS KNEW THE OFFICIAL CROWN COURT TIMINGS ALONE PROVED THE CROWN COURT TRIAL AUDIO TAPED RECORDINGS MUST HAVE BEEN TAMPERED WITH AFTER THE FACT!!
VERY DODGY INDEED WHEN THE JUDICIARY THEMSELVES SWEAR ON THE BIBLE THAT ALL AUDIO TAPED RECORDINGS OF SERIOUS CROWN COURT TRIAL PROCEEDINGS ARE SET IN STONE!!
THE WEST MIDLANDS POLICE FORCE PUNISHED FOR SIMILAR CRIME
THE POLICE FORCE WERE PUNISHED FOR THE SIMILAR CRIME OF PUTTING IN INCRIMINATING EVIDENCE AFTER THE FACT, TO GAIN FALSE CONVICTIONS!! SO WHY IS THE JUDICIARY NOT ACCOUNTABLE FOR ITS OWN CRIMINAL ACTIONS? E.S.D.A. (Electro-Static Detection Apparatus), the latest technology at that time, proved undeniably the police were putting in supposed written self-admissions of crimes in suspects' and witnesses' written statements. These included two of the most famous,notorious,crimes of the last half of the 20th century,
1st)The murder of PC Blakelock in the Broadwater Farm riots.
2nd)The Birmingham Pub Bombings.
This is why NOW ALL police interviews are taped. They make two identical copies, one for themselves and the other for the suspects legal team. THEY ARE BOTH SEALED STRAIGHT AWAY so they cannot be tampered with. The suspect is also given a choice of which tape he takes for his legal team! Although the Judiciary are being forced to hand over the CROWN COURT TRIAL AUDIO TAPED RECORDINGS, they just simply refuse because THEIR OWN OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS WITH THE REAL TIMINGS ON PROVE THE CROWN COURT TRIAL AUDIO TAPED RECORDINGS MUST HAVE BEEN TAMPERED WITH EVEN BEFORE YOU EXAMINE THE CONTENTS ON THEM!!
I received five years in jail for a physical and forensically IMPOSSIBLE crime! I told the Parole Board I'm not admitting to an impossible crime and I set a Judicial Precedent by STILL GETTING PAROLE BECAUSE EVEN THEY KNOW I WAS STITCHED UP!!
IT'S NOW TIME FOR THE COVER UP AND TAMPER THE CROWN COURT TRIAL AUDIO TAPED RECORDINGS TO MATCH HIS FALSE CLAIMS TO THE JURY IN HIS CORRUPT SUMMING UP!!
TO COVER THIS UP, YET ANOTHER IMPOSSIBILITY by bending time with 2/3rds of TWO DEFENCE MEDICAL EXPERT WITNESSES AUDIO TAPED RECORDED EVIDENCE VANISHED VERBATIM (word for word), with a new conjured up tampered “possible” version replaced in the 1/3rd left remaining. THEY JUST CAN'T EXPLAIN THE LOST TIME AT COURT! Also it has been doctored so much that AMAZINGLY IT DOESN'T EVEN HAVE THE REAL ORIGINAL AND ONLY PROSECUTION VERSION IN IT, GIVEN BY THAT ONE PROSECUTION WITNESS!! SMOKING GUN EVIDENCE OF CORRUPTION!
RECONSTRUCTIONS OF THE 'CRIME'
SIMPLE LIVE OR PICTURED RECONSTRUCTIONS OF THE TWO ABSOLUTELY DIFFERENT VERSIONS shows how blatant this fraud really is. Also backed up by EVERY LEGAL DOCUMENT IN THE CASE!!
BENT BASSRA KNEW CRIME NOT POSSIBLE
BENT “DEFENCE BARRISTER” SUKHBIR BASSRA, WHOSE OWN “REGINA-V-COOPER 1969” (Lurking doubt), STATES THAT THE JURY COULD NOT HAVE POSSIBLY OF FOUND ME GUILTY OF THE CRIME ON THE EVIDENCE THAT THEY HAD HEARD WHICH DIRECTLY IMPLICATES BENT JUDGE JAMES GOSS DID LIE IN HIS SUMMING UP SAYING THE REAL PROSECUTION VERSION WAS POSSIBLE!! ALSO IT SHOWS THE PROVEN CROWN COURT TRIAL AUDIO TAPED RECORDINGS WHICH 'STATE' THE PROSECUTION VERSION POSSIBLE MUST HAVE BEEN TAMPERED WITH AFTER THE FACT!! THIS MEANS BY LAW IT WAS AN 'UNSATISFACTORY VERDICT' !!
COURT OF APPEAL cases which have "FRESH EVIDENCE,"gives cases with original grounds for appeal of "LURKING DOUBT", such as my case ABSOLUTE TOP PRIORITY!
THE BIG PICTURE
DAVID BLUNKETT AND YVETTE COOPER KNOW ALL! they covered up and kept the lid on Pandora's box of undeniable premeditated judicial corruption!! Also included in this DOCUMENTED PROOF, he has deliberately lied! He has breached the PUBLIC DISCLOSURE ACT 1998 because miscarriage of justice is one of the criteria he MUST disclose to the general public, especially when it involves corruption within his own ranks! His colleague Beverley Hughes was forced to resign for a similar breach of protocol when she lied and said she had not been informed off Steve Moxon of the fast track immigration scandal over at Sheffield. Like me he had the proof, therefore she was sacked.
1st) RETAIN THE JURY SYSTEM
DAVID BLUNKETT'S CIVIL CONTINGENCY BILL sent to the house of Lords on the 25th May 2004 includes depriving people of FULL AND FAIR HEARINGS by getting rid of juries and leaving the verdict decisions solely to the judges alone. My case proves UNDENIABLY that not all judges are to be trusted! This idea should be put on ice at least until like the rest of us in the U.K.(including the police Force,) the judiciary are also accountable for their own criminal actions!!
Surely in the 21st Century there should not be a two tier system solely because you are part of the British judiciary... should there?
THIS IS WHY DAVID BLUNKETT AND YVETTE COOPER COVERED UP UNDENIABLE PREMEDITATED JUDICIAL CORRUPTION IN MY CROWN COURT CASE BECAUSE IT WOULD GO DIRECTLY AGAINST HIS OWN CIVIL CONTINGENCIES BILL!!
2nd) SHOULD COURT PROCEEDINGS BE VIDEOED ?
We advocate the video recording (audio and visual) of all serious court proceedings as they do in other countries. This would include on-screen timing of these events.
JURY HAVE COME FORWARD
TWO MEMBERS OF THE ORIGINAL JURY AT MY TRIAL ARE AWARE OF MY LENGTHY CAMPAIGN AND HAVE COME FORWARD TO BACK MY UNDENIABLE CLAIMS OF CORRUPTION BECAUSE THEY COULD NOT LIVE WITH THEMSELVES KNOWING JUSTICE HAS BEEN PERVERTED !!!
ASK THE JURY, THEY KNOW: -
B. The conjured-up fake possible version in THE PROVEN TAMPERED CROWN COURT TRIAL AUDIO TAPED RECORDINGS and transcripts!!
2ND FOR THE PROSECUTION
MEDIA RECEIVE £10,000 OR A MASSIVE SCOOP
I’LL GIVE MEDIA £10,000 IF I DON'T PROVE UNPRECEDENTED AND UNDENIABLE EVIDENCE OF PREMEDITATED JUDICIAL CORRUPTION. It's a win/win situation, you get £10,000 if I don't prove it and if I do prove it, you've got a massive scoop! PLUS THIS EXPOSURE IS IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST! Why? Because it could happen to YOU or anyone else in the UK. There must be THOUSANDS of other people over the hundreds of years of the British Judiciary who were innocent but faced a Judge with only one verdict on his mind .....GUILTY!!! This Kangaroo court was nothing more than what you would expect from a Banana Republic. In the reality of my appearance at court, bent Judge Goss even burst out laughing, so did the public gallery when the Prosecution Barrister (Mr Haring) tried a ridiculous scenario for me to have done the crime to fit in with the MEDICAL FACTS which he actually said tongue in cheek and smirking. Obviously the pathologist dismissed this as RIDICULOUS. Amazingly the day after in his bent summing up to the jury, the judge lied and said the pathologist had accepted it. Utter lies!!
THE REASON HE HAD TO TRY THIS RIDICULOUS SCENARIO WAS BECAUSE MR HARING TRIED FIRSTLY THE ORIGINAL SCENARIO IN THAT ONE WITNESSES STATEMENT AND IT WAS PROVEN NOT POSSIBLE!!
THE MAIN CRIMINALS WHO WERE IN LEAGUE:-
Contact Charles on - 07561 193606 or 07554916591
BY LAW THE POLICE MUST INVESTIGATE A COMPLAINT OF A CRIME, ESPECIALLY IN THIS CASE WHERE THERE IS HARD EVIDENCE TO BACK UP THIS FACT. It is a four points complaints procedure ending in a formal resolution, possibly ending in a caution, a reprimand or eveptember and the 3rd October 2002, I made an official complaint to the police, log number 822 of the 29th of October 2002.THEN I ACTUALLY WENT TO TYRLS BRADFORD SOUTH POLICE STATION ON THE 4th NOVEMBER 2002 WHERE I WAS SEEN BY SERGEANT RICHARD ABBOT AT 2pm.
IF THIS HAD BEEN INVESTIGATED LIKE IT SHOULD OF BY LAW, I WOULD NOT HAVE GONE ON ANY ROOFS TRYING TO TELL THE TRUTH IN THE FIRST PLACE....... IS IT NOT THE TRUTH THAT COUNTS??
I was due back at Manchester Crown Court on Monday 29th November 2004 at 9.45 a.m. . The chances of me getting a fair trial were ZERO, due to the fact it is their own Crown Court buddies in Yorkshire I have the undeniable evidence of corruption against!
I HAVE JUST FOUND OUT THAT ON THE EVE OF THIS TRIAL THAT MY "DEFENCE BARRISTER" PATRICK CASSIDY AND MY "SOLICITOR" PATRICK HARRIS OF CLIFFORD JOHNSON AND CO HAVE BOTH ABANDONED ME. THERES NO DOUBT ABOUT IT, I'M IN THE PROCESS OF BEEN RAIL ROADED YET AGAIN !!
******11th) I AM NOW DUE BACK AT COURT ON TUESDAY 8th MARCH 2005 REPRESENTING MYSELF, ALSO ADVISED BY MY McENZIE FRIEND PATRICK CULLINANE. I WOULD PERSONALLY LIKE TO THANK HIM AND THE REST OF THE TEAM FOR YOUR ATTENDANCE AND FANTASTIC SUPPORT AT MANCHESTER CROWN COURT ON NUMEROUS OCCASIONS, ESPECIALLY BEARING IN MIND YOU TRAVELLED FROM ALL FOUR CORNERS OF THE COUNTRY AND THE REPUBLIC OF IRELAND!!
6th) Football pitch protest at F.A. cup final between Manchester United and Millwall at the Millennium Stadium Cardiff South Wales - Saturday 22nd May 2004 - I didn't manage to get the website www.bentjudgejamesgoss.co.uk which was wrote on my banner into the public eye. I went back to Cardiff Magistrates court at 9.45am Friday 25th June 2004 and pleaded guilty to going on the football field. They let me off virtually scot-free because they know damn well the evidence I have is undeniable!!
7th) Cricket pitch protest at Headingley, Leeds. England v New Zealand - Saturday 5th June 2004, I've been going on like a parrot for the last 8 years with sweet F.A. progress so I thought I'd let the parrot do my talking! (I had an inflatable parrot strapped to my waist over my G-string.) The Police don't charge me because they know damn well I'm telling the truth!!
8th) Inside Leeds Crown Court - Tuesday 13th July 2004. Bent "Defence Barrister" Sukhbir Bassra was present and was made well aware of our campaign against Goss and himself.
Q) SO WHY DON'T THEY SUE ME FOR LIBEL??
9th) Cricket pitch protest at Edgbaston, Birmingham. England v West Indies - Sunday 1st August 2004. I am charged with running onto a field of play. I went to Birmingham Magistrates Court on Thursday 25th November 2004 and received a £150 fine.
10th) Outside the Houses of Parliament - Tuesday and Wednesday 14th/15th September 2004.(Parliament Square), Westminster London.
11th+5th) MANCHESTER CROWN COURT TUESDAY 8th MARCH 2005. THIS CORRUPT FIASCO BEGUN ON MY 5th) PROTEST ON DEANSGATE MANCHESTER 30th/31st MARCH LAST YEAR.
AFTER A FOUR DAY TRIAL, THE JURY WERE UNDECIDED BUT INSTEAD OF THROWING THE CASE OUT DUE TO EVEN MORE MASSIVE EXPENSE TO THE PUBLIC PURSE, THE JUDICIARY WANT A RE-TRIAL!!
12th) Re-trial at Manchester Crown Court - Monday 1st August 2005. Last time, MY McENZIE FRIEND PATRICK CULLINANE AND SEVERAL OF MY ASSOCIATES WERE BANISHED FROM THE COURT PROCEEDINGS. So on my own, I was up against 23 Police Officers (including 2 Chief Inspectors), Judge Ensor, the C.P.S. (Jim Plumbly) and the Prosecuting Barrister (Mr Woodhall.)
Last time the odds were stacked against me but this time they are forcing me into court without my star witnesses who are actually some of the prosecution witnesses. They are also refusing me the transcripts from the first trial!!
BOTH THESE ACTS ARE ILLEGAL !!
THIS IS THEIR CHANCE TO LOCK ME UP FOR A LONG TIME FOR THE SIMPLE PURPOSE OF KEEPING ME QUIET AND NOT EXPOSING THE TRUTH OF UNDENIABLE PREMEDITATED JUDICIAL CORRUPTION!!
Conclusion They offer me a deal to plead guilty and a promise to not send me to jail but I pay a £250 fine. I accepted because the whole reason I am protesting in the first place is wrongful imprisonment!
13th) Leafletting campaign in bent Judge James Goss's own village - Saturday 22nd September 2007. Leaflet containing www.bentjudgejamesgoss.co.uk and how we found out where he lived via the world wide web.(PUBLIC DOMAIN).
14th) A leafletting campaign in the park square across from his Chambers Leeds. 30th June 2008. (Monday)
17th) Outside Leeds Crown Court again - Monday 1st December 2008, where he was presiding at court 10 then court 2. Another leafletting campaign against him. The defendants who's lives he has in his hands that day were given information and this website and were told they would be found guilty no matter what. I WAS THEN THROWN OUT OF COURT AGAIN FOR TELLING THE TRUTH !! He then phoned the Police 3 times that day to remove me from outside the court without success. Yet again the Police agreed he has some front considering the seriousness of HIS crimes!!
A) IF I WAS TO GET STITCHED UP AGAIN,I WOULD GET A MANDATORY LIFE SENTENCE ON THE TWO STRIKES AND YOU ARE OUT RULE !! THIS COULD HAPPEN TO ANYBODY ELSE IN THE U.K.!!
FINALLY THE MOST IMPORTANT PART, Rest In Peace, my dear friend ANDREW SWINDELLS (Swinny), the GREATEST BURNLEY FAN I EVER KNEW, a Yorkshire Claret through and through. We both knew within our hearts we would never see our beloved Burnley F.C. in an F.A. Cup Final. Well, Pal, today is the closest thing to it.(Man Utd v Millwall protest.) I know you will be looking down from that Claret and Blue heaven you are in, with that smirk followed by a sharp laugh at my outrageous quest for justice. I have sprinkled your ashes all over Burnley F.C.'s Turf Moor Pitch at your loving mother and fathers request. We knew you wanted this and you are now a season ticket holder for the rest of eternity!!
LISTEN MATE, YOUR FAMILY AND FRIENDS MISS YOU WITH ALL OUR HEARTS. WE WILL BE SEEING YOU. X. LEST WE FORGET!!!